| 593 | 3 | 38 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
"御"起源于驾车,定型于君主专称。本文通过梳理"御"观念的演变,分析其与中国古代治国之道的关系。文章首先简要论述马在国家政治中具有重要地位,指明以御为治国隐喻的发生根源。接下来沿动、静两条线索展开:第一,御的动词式演进,经历"御马→御民→御臣"的转化。先秦诸子对此均有贡献,但是充分奠定御的君术地位的无疑是韩非,他的"驾车喻"具有"技艺""控制""主体客体对抗"等特征。第二,御的名词式演进,经历"御者→御礼→御制"的转变。这是一个从具体名词到抽象概念凝固化的过程,仪式是名词性演化的核心。秦汉之际,皇权建立,御最终转化为君主专称,儒家的御礼和法家的御臣术共同缔造了强大的君权。御作为君制概念反应了先人对于治国的理解:君主以仪式和控制实现统治,政治生活中充满了对抗,又不乏协同。
Abstract:The Chinese character Yu( 御,Drive / Royal) has complex meanings,which originated in driving a carriage and finalized in royal as a special item for the emperor. By analyzing the evolution history of "Yu",this paper shows a governance idea budding in the Pre-Qin Period in ancient China. In order to explore the reason for make a metaphor by Yu,Part One will briefly discuss the horse important status in national politics.Part Two and Three will argue separately in dynamic and static aspects: First,the verb transformation of Yu( Drive),i. e. from Drive Carriage to Dominated Subjects then to Control Officials,which indicates changes in driving objects. Though many Pre-Qin Period scholars contributed to this transformation,the most important one is Han Fei who endowed metaphor of Yu( Drive) with several characters,such as technique,control and contest between subject and object. Second,the noun transformation of Yu( Royal),i. e. from Charioteer to Royal Ceremony then to Emperor System. This is a process from concrete to abstract noun and ritual play a key role in the noun evolution of Yu. Up to the Qin and Han Dynasty Emperor System established finally,Yu( Royal) became a special term for emperor. At the same time,imperial ceremony in Confucian and controlling officials' strategy in Legalist jointly created a powerful monarch. As a royal concept,Yu reflects ancestral understanding of governance: since there are full of confrontation in political life,monarch should ruled subjects by controlling power and rituals. This governance idea influences China as long as two thousand years even in current time.
古籍:《百官公卿表》《管子》《韩非子》《汉书》《淮南子》《孔丛子》《孔子家语》《老子》《礼记》《论语》《尚书》《诗经》《史记》《世本》《四书章句集注》《荀子》《晏子春秋》《左传》等。
柏拉图,2002年:《理想国》,郭斌和、张竹明译,商务印书馆。
《皇朝政治学问答》,1902年,北洋官报总局印。
练春海,2012年:《汉代车马形象研究:以御礼为中心》,广西师范大学出版社。
束有春,1997年:《先秦舆人及御夫考述》,载《江苏社会科学》第5期。
王元亮,2015年:《治理概念的学理辨析》,见《第十届中国青年政治学论坛会议论文》。
杨朝明,2002年:《〈孔子家语·执辔〉篇与孔子的治国思想》,载《中国文献学丛刊》,天津百花文艺出版社。
杨宽,2003年:《战国史》,上海人民出版社。
基本信息:
中图分类号:B21
引用信息:
[1]戴木茅.“御”与中国古代的治国之道[J].哲学研究,2016(04):45-52+129.
基金信息:
2015年河北省社会科学基金项目“从《韩非子》看政治心理对制度建设的影响”(编号HB15ZZ017)的阶段性成果
2016-04-25
2016-04-25